Unit-3 Risk and Uncertainty Decisions
1) Project
risk:
Risk is the possibility of loss or injury. Project risk is an uncertain
event or condition that, if it occurs, has an effect on at least one project
objective. Risk management focuses on
identifying and assessing the risks to the project and managing those risks to
minimize the impact on the project. There are no risk-free projects because
there are an infinite number of events that can have a negative effect on the
project. Risk management is not about eliminating risk but about identifying,
assessing, and managing risk.
a.
Risk management is not
widely used.
b.
The projects that were
most likely to have a risk management plan were those that were perceived to be
high risk.
c.
When risk management
practices were applied to projects, they appeared to be positively related to
the success of the project.
d.
The risk management
approach influenced project schedules and cost goals but exerted less influence
on project product quality.
e.
Good risk management
increases the likelihood of a successful project.
f. Risk deals with the uncertainty of events that could affect the project.
Some potential negative project events have a high likelihood of occurring on
specific projects. Examples are as follows:
g.
Safety risks are
common on construction projects.
h.
Changes in the value
of local currency during a project affect purchasing power and budgets on
projects with large international components.
i.
Projects that depend
on good weather, such as road construction or coastal projects, face risk of
delays due to exceptionally wet or windy weather.
j.
Project risk is the possibility that project events will
not occur as planned or that unplanned events will occur that will have a
negative impact on the project.
k.
Known risks can be identified before they occur, while
unknown risks are unforeseen.
l.
Organizational risks are associated with the business
purpose of the project and assumed by the client when deciding to do the
project.
2) Types
of project risk:
The most common
project risks are:
1.
Cost risk: typically escalation
of project costs due to poor cost estimating accuracy and scope creep.
2.
Schedule risk: the risk that
activities will take longer than expected. Slippages in schedule typically
increase costs and, also, delay the receipt of project benefits, with a
possible loss of competitive advantage.
3.
Performance risk: the risk that the
project will fail to produce results consistent with project specifications.
4.
There are many other types of risks of concern to projects. These risks can result in cost, schedule, or
performance problems and create other types of adverse consequences for the
organization.
5.
Governance risk: relates to board
and management performance with regard to ethics, community stewardship, and
company reputation.
6.
Strategic risks: result from
errors in strategy, such as choosing a technology that can’t be made to work.
7.
Operational risk: includes risks
from poor implementation and process problems such as procurement, production,
and distribution.
8.
Market risks: include
competition, foreign exchange, commodity markets, and interest rate risk, as
well as liquidity and credit risks.
9.
Legal risks: arise from legal
and regulatory obligations, including contract risks and litigation brought
against the organization.
10.
Risks associated with
external hazards: including storms, floods, and earthquakes; vandalism, sabotage,
and terrorism; labor strikes; and civil unrest.
3) Identifying the risk
The risk identification process on a
project is typically one of brainstorming,
and the usual rules of brainstorming apply:
·
The full project team should be
actively involved.
·
Potential risks should be identified by all
members of the project team.
·
No criticism of any suggestion is
permitted.
· Any potential risk identified by
anyone should be recorded, regardless of whether other
members of the group consider it to be significant.
· All potential risks identified by
brainstorming should be
documented and followed up by
the IPT.
The objective
of risk identification is to identify all possible risks, not to eliminate
risks from consideration or to develop solutions for mitigating risks—those functions
are carried out during the risk assessment and risk mitigation steps. Some of
the documentation and materials that should be used in risk identification as
they become available include these:
·
Sponsor
mission, objectives, and strategy; and project goals to achieve this strategy,
·
SOW,
· Project
justification and cost-effectiveness (project benefits, present worth, rate of
return, etc.),
·
WBS,
· Project
performance specifications and technical specifications,
·
Project
schedule and milestones,
·
Project
financing plan,
·
Project
procurement plan,
·
Project
execution plan,
·
Project
benefits projection,
·
Project
cost estimate,
·
Project
environmental impact statement,
·
Regulations
and congressional reports that may affect the project,
· News
articles about how the project is viewed by regulators, politicians, and the
public, and
·
Historical
safety performance.
4) Risk category
To relate
the risk categories to the levels of project objectives, the three categories
are defined as follows:
A.
Operational risks: This term refers to risks related to
operational objectives of the project. This means risks restricted to the
direct results from the project—that is, its products.
B.
Short-term strategic risks: This term refers to risks related to
the short-term strategic objectives of the project.
In other
words, short-term strategic risks are risks related to the objectives for
project owner's use of the project results after the project has been
completed. It may also mean the risk for first-order effects of the
project—that is, risk for the effects that should be achieved for the target
group or users.
C . Long-term strategic risks: This term refers to risks related to long-term strategic objectives of the
project—in other words, risks related to the project purpose, or, the long-term
objective that the project is meant to contribute to.
Operational
criteria, used to evaluate whether a given risk element is long-term strategic,
short-term strategic, or operational include the following:
1. The risk element is considered an operational
risk when: the risk element is a risk to the project output (which
should be specified in a project definition/delivery contract)—i.e., a risk to
the project's ability to deliver.
2. The risk element is a short-term
strategic risk when: the risk element is a risk to a
functionality not clearly specified in project
definition/delivery contract, but is necessary in order to
achieve the effects of the project (restricted to the first-order effects for
the target group/users).
3. The risk element is a long-term
strategic risk when: the risk element is a risk to achieving the
long-term objectives of the project, but not a risk of the two categories
mentioned above (i.e., operational or short-term strategic risk).
1.
Political
Most
projects will be affected by organizational politics, but you should also be
aware of the possibilities of impact from local or national politics (or even
international politics, if that’s appropriate for your project).
A change in
government will affect policy decisions and potentially funding, especially for
projects with an element of public sector work or those working with government
bodies.
2.
Economic
The economy
has a huge impact on businesses, and that filters down to have an impact on
certain projects. At a macro level you might be looking at the national economy
and the implications on your product set, for example. You could also use this
category as a discussion point for the ‘economy’ of your organization, looking
at the impact of funding cycles for multi-year projects or considering what
would happen to your project budget if certain conditions were true.
3.
Technological
Technology
is moving on at a rapid speed, and it’s possible that technological changes
could make your project more or less viable over a period of time. This should
be built into your approach to managing volatile projects.
There are
also risks relating to using new technology for the first time, or in an
immature way.
4. Legal
Your Legal
team or advisors should be connected to changes in the law and regulations
affecting your industry. These may have implications for projects that should
be considered. A risk resulting from legal changes that may mean your project
is no longer viable.
Alternatively,
your project may be to make your business compliant with new regulations. This
can introduce risk around what would happen if the timescales for the project
were not met and the business was not compliant when the deadline comes into
force.
5.
Market
Some
industries have a more stable marketplace than others, and you’ll know your own
market well. Risks relating to your position in the market, the demand for your
goods and services and the rise of new competitors can all affect your project.
Staying close to how your market is changing is crucial for any business
wanting to compete, so you’ll need to make sure that the people who truly
understand what is happening are well-connected to your project teams so that
the information is passed on.
6.
Supply Chain
Rarely these
days will you do a project that has no reliance on anyone else. Whether that’s
the manufacturer of a critical part for your product, or a vendor supplying you
with cloud-based software, our organizations are more linked together than ever
before.
7.
Organizational
This type of
risk relates to changes in the organizational structure. This might apply if
you have a change of leadership, which might in turn lead to a change in
strategic direction. It’s crucial to make sure project teams are aware of these
risks and then what to do if they happen, because something like this could
quickly make a project unviable.
8.
Operations
These risks
relate to impacts on how your business is run. That could be anything from risk
that would impact the ability to keep a critical process running in the factory
through to making sure the project goes ahead without impacting your customer
services.
9.
Environmental
Environmental
risks range from those that could expose your organization to fines or even
legislative action, such as illegal dumping, through to ensuring that your
internal environmental policies are adhered to.
Risks in
this category are likely to be heavily tied to your position on corporate and
social responsibility, and can also affect reputational risk, for example if
your business is seen to be polluting.
10.
Financial
Financial
risks on projects relate to funding cycles, access to funding and making sure
that the cash flow is available to pay invoices on time. It’s prudent to
consider financial risks to projects because if there are problems in this area,
projects could stall, putting all prior investment at risk of being wasted.
11.
Resources
Specifically,
non-people resources. This kind of risk relates to whether you can get access
to the equipment, materials and other resources required to deliver the project
in a timely fashion. Risks around delivery of equipment or the inability to
source specialist materials would fall into this category.
12.
Staffing
Alongside
non-people resources, you also have to consider staffing risks. These are
things like the right people not being available at the right time due to other
projects overrunning, or lack of expertise within your business. It would also
extend to the risk of staff sickness, and poorly timed vacations.
13.
Scheduling
Risks in
this category affect the project timeline. A common risk here is that a task
turns out to be more complicated than expected, and so it takes longer. This
would add delay to the schedule if the task is on the critical path.
14.
Reputation
Reputational
risk was touched on earlier in the section about environmental risk, but it is
worth mentioning again. Today, when it seems like an organization’s reputation
can be won or lost on a Tweet, it is definitely worth considering the risk to
reputation when you work through the identification exercise. As well as
focusing on the public face of your business, think about the impact on
investors and on your own staff. Reputation matters when it comes to retaining
talent in your organization.
15.
Other
It’s useful
to have an ‘other’ category! This prompts the question: “What have we
forgotten?” during risk identification discussions. You need space to be able
to think about things that don’t neatly fall into the categories above, or
perhaps fall into several and need to be split out in a different way.
5) Methods
using risk identification
a.
Reviewing
documentation from past projects
b.
Conducting
brainstorming sessions
c.
Engaging subject
matter experts
d.
Working directly with
stakeholders via questionnaire or survey
e.
Facilitating a “Why
This Won’t Work” meeting
6) Project risk Analysis
Risk
Analysis is the sequence of processes of risk management planning, analysis of
risks, identification and controlling risk on a project.
Risk
Management Process primarily involves following activities
1.
Plan risk management:It is the procedure of defining how to perform
risk management activities for a project.
2.
Identify risk: It is the procedure of determining which risk
may affect the project most. This process involves documentation of existing
risks.
The
input for identifying risk will be
·
Risk management plan
·
Project scope statement
·
Cost management plan
·
Schedule management plan
·
Human resource management plan
·
Scope baseline
·
Activity cost estimates
·
Activity duration estimates
·
Stakeholder register
·
Project documents
·
Procurement documents
·
Communication management plan
·
Enterprise environmental factor
·
Organizational process assets
·
Perform qualitative risk analysis
·
Perform quantitative risk analysis
·
Plan risk responses
·
Monitor and control risks
3.
Perform qualitative risk analysis: It is the process of prioritizing risks for further analysis or
action by combining and assessing their probability of occurrence and impact.
It helps managers to lessen the uncertainty level and concentrate on high
priority risks.
Plan risk management should take place early
in the project, it can impact on various
aspects like cost, time, scope, quality and procurement.
The
inputs for qualitative risk analysis includes
·
Risk management plan
·
Scope baseline
·
Risk register
·
Enterprise environmental factors
·
Organizational process assets
4.
Quantitative risk analysis: It is the procedure of numerically analyzing the effect of
identified risks on overall project objectives. In order to minimize the
project uncertainty, this kind of analysis are quite helpful for decision
making.
The
input of this stage is
·
Risk management plan
·
Cost management plan
·
Schedule management plan
·
Risk register
·
Enterprise environmental factors
·
Organizational process assets
5.
Plan risk responses: To enhance opportunities and to minimize threats to project
objectives plan risk response is helpful. It addresses the risks by their
priority, activities into the budget, schedule, and project management plan.
The
inputs for plan risk responses are
·
Risk management plan
·
Risk register
6.
Control Risks: Control risk is the procedure of tracking identified risks,
identifying new risks, monitoring residual risks and evaluating risk.
The
inputs for this stage includes
·
Project management plan
·
Risk register
·
Work performance data
·
Work performance reports
7) Qualitative analysis and Quantitative analysis
Qualitative Risk Analysis :A
qualitative risk analysis prioritizes the identified project risks using a
pre-defined rating scale. Risks will be scored based on their probability or
likelihood of occurring and the impact on project objectives should they occur.
Probability/likelihood
is commonly ranked on a zero to one scale (for example, .3 equating to a 30%
probability of the risk event occurring).
The
impact scale is organizationally defined (for example, a one to five scale,
with five being the highest impact on project objectives - such as budget,
schedule, or quality).
A
qualitative risk analysis will also include the appropriate categorization of
the risks, either source-based or effect-based.
Quantitative Risk Analysis
A
quantitative risk analysis is a further analysis of the highest priority risks
during a which a numerical or quantitative rating is assigned in order to
develop a probabilistic analysis of the project.
A
quantitative analysis:
- quantifies the possible outcomes for the project and assesses the probability of achieving specific project objectives
- provides a quantitative approach to making decisions when there is uncertainty
- creates realistic and achievable cost, schedule or scope targets
- quantifies the possible outcomes for the project and assesses the probability of achieving specific project objectives
- provides a quantitative approach to making decisions when there is uncertainty
- creates realistic and achievable cost, schedule or scope targets
In
order to conduct a quantitative risk analysis, you will need high-quality data,
a well-developed project model, and a prioritized lists of project risks
(usually from performing a qualitative risk analysis)
8)
Sensitivity
Analysis
A
sensitivity analysis determines how different values of an independent variable
affect a particular dependent variable under a given set of assumptions. This
technique is used within specific boundaries that depend on one or more input
variables, such as the effect that changes in interest rates (independent
variable) has on bond prices (dependent variable).
Methods
of Sensitivity Analysis
There are
different methods to carry out the sensitivity analysis:
- Modeling
and simulation techniques
- Scenario
management tools through Microsoft excel
There are mainly
two approaches to analyzing sensitivity:
- Local
Sensitivity Analysis
- Global
Sensitivity Analysis
1) Local sensitivity analysis: is derivative based (numerical or analytical). The term local
indicates that the derivatives are taken at a single point. This method is apt
for simple cost functions, but not feasible for complex models, like models
with discontinuities do not always have derivatives.
Mathematically,
the sensitivity of the cost function with respect to certain parameters is
equal to the partial derivative of the cost function with respect to those
parameters.
Local
sensitivity analysis is a one-at-a-time (OAT) technique that analyzes the impact of one parameter
on the cost function at a time, keeping the other parameters fixed.
2) Global sensitivity analysis: is the second approach to
sensitivity analysis, often implemented using Monte Carlo techniques. This
approach uses a global set of samples to explore the design space.
9) Break-Even Analysis:
Another
form of financial analysis is breakeven analysis. It is a technique for finding
a point at which a project will cover its costs, or break even. It is often
used to make an initial decision on whether to proceed with a project.
Breakeven analysis is also a technique of financial control in the sense that
further analyses may be necessary as conditions change.
For example, an initial breakeven
analysis may have indicated that sales of 80,000 units would be needed for a
division to breakeven. Midway through the project, however, material costs
could rise, anticipated demand could change, or price for the product could
drop.
Any or all of these changes would alter the breakeven point.
This in turn would signal to the organisation that it might wish to cancel the
project to minimise losses. Hence, breakeven analysis can be used initially for
decision-making and later for control.
The break-even point (BEP) is the point
on a chart at which total revenue exactly equals total costs (fixed and variable),
Fig. illustrates how the BEP is computed.